Beer Taxes: Effective Or Just A Burden?

Alcoholic drinks are taxed according to their alcohol by volume (ABV) percentage. Beer and spirits are taxed based on alcoholic strength, while other types of alcohol are taxed on a specific duty based on overall volume. Wines, for example, are taxed on their total volume rather than the volume of pure alcohol they contain. Alcohol duty rates vary according to the type of beverage and its ABV. The UK government's reform of alcohol duty, which came into effect on 1 August 2023, changed the way duty is applied and amended the duty rates, with the aim of simplifying the system and reducing the number of rates.

Beer and spirits are taxed based on alcoholic strength

In the United States, alcoholic beverages are taxed differently depending on their classification as beer, wine, or spirits. Beer and wine are taxed by volume, while spirits are taxed based on alcohol content. The alcohol content of beer and wine is taxed at a lower rate than spirits. For instance, the general tax on beer is approximately 9 cents per ounce of pure alcohol, while the tax on spirits can be as high as 21 cents per ounce.

The UK also taxes alcoholic beverages based on alcoholic strength. The duty rates are specified per litre of pure alcohol in the product. For example, beer, spirits, wine, and other fermented products with an alcohol content between 3.5% and 8.5% are taxed at a certain rate, with higher rates for products with higher alcohol content.

The rationale behind taxing alcoholic beverages based on alcoholic strength is to reduce the external harms associated with alcohol consumption, such as drunk driving, violence, and property damage. Higher taxes on beverages with higher alcohol content can help discourage overconsumption and reduce the negative impacts on public health and safety.

However, the current categorical tax system for alcoholic beverages has come under scrutiny due to innovations in the alcohol production industry. The emergence of new products, such as hard seltzers and ready-to-drink cocktails, has blurred the lines between categories, making the taxation system complex and inefficient. There are calls for a more simplified and neutral tax system, such as an alcohol by volume (ABV) tax, which would tax all drinks with the same alcohol content at the same rate.

Wine is taxed on total volume

Wine taxes are based on the total volume of wine, with excise taxes being a common form of taxation. Excise taxes are imposed on specific goods, such as cigarettes, alcoholic beverages, soda, gasoline, and insurance premiums. In the United States, wine excise tax regulations can be found in the 26 U.S.C. 5041-5043.

The taxation of wine varies across different states in the US. Wine is typically taxed at a higher rate than beer but lower than distilled spirits due to its mid-range alcohol content. For example, Kentucky has the highest wine excise tax at $3.23 per gallon, while California and Texas have the lowest at $0.20.

Some states, such as Arkansas and Tennessee, levy case fees in addition to per-gallon taxes. Minnesota, on the other hand, imposes bottle fees that vary based on container size. Additionally, some states have a government monopoly on the wholesale or retail sale of wine, also known as "control" states, which include Mississippi, New Hampshire, Pennsylvania, Utah, and Wyoming.

The calculation of wine taxes can be complex, and it is important to consider the various cost components that make up the retail price of wine. These include the wholesale price, wholesale taxes, markup, and retail tax. The retail tax can be further broken down into federal and state-specific excise taxes, ad valorem excise taxes, and state alcohol sales taxes.

Overall, the taxation of wine is an important aspect of alcohol policy, as it can impact consumption patterns and related problems. By taxing wine based on its total volume, governments can regulate its consumption and generate revenue for general government services.

Marginal changes in tax rates or freezes are common

Some states also implement tax rates based on the location of the seller and the quantity produced. For example, Georgia charges a nearly four times higher excise tax on wine produced outside the state compared to wine produced within Georgia. Additionally, Montana's excise tax rate on beer is over three times higher for companies producing more than 10,000 barrels.

In addition to excise taxes, some states and localities impose special sales taxes on the final purchase price of alcohol. For instance, Washington, D.C., levies both per-gallon taxes and a 10.25% alcohol sales tax, which is higher than its general sales tax rate.

Alcohol duty reforms can create incentives for lower-strength products

The previous system had several issues, including significant disparities in duty charged for the same-strength products, mixed incentives to produce weaker strength products, and an inconsistent approach to taxation due to EU regulatory requirements. The new reforms address these issues by focusing on the alcohol by volume (ABV) of the product. This means that products of the same strength will face the same rate of duty, regardless of whether they are beer, wine, or cider.

The new Small Producer Relief applies to eligible producers of alcoholic products with an alcoholic strength of less than 8.5% ABV that are consumed in the UK. Producers will be eligible for the relief if they produce less than 4,500 hectolitres (hL) of alcohol per year. This reform extends the relief previously enjoyed by small breweries to all producers of alcoholic products under 8.5% ABV.

The Draught Relief reduces the tax burden on draught alcoholic products sold in pubs and other on-trade venues. This relief provides a reduced rate of duty on draught alcoholic products under 8.5% ABV packaged in containers of at least 20 litres. These reforms create incentives for lower-strength products by reducing the tax burden on producers and sellers of these drinks.

In addition to the UK's reforms, other countries have also implemented or proposed similar changes to their alcohol taxation systems. For example, the United States has considered replacing its existing alcohol tax system with an Alcohol by Volume (ABV) tax, which would tax all drinks containing the same amount of alcohol at the same rate. This approach would simplify the tax system and make it more transparent and neutral.

Overall, alcohol duty reforms that create incentives for lower-strength products can be effective in encouraging the production and consumption of drinks with lower alcohol content. These reforms can also simplify complex tax systems and address inconsistencies in the previous duty structures.

Alcohol duties are estimated to raise £12.7 billion in 2024-25

Alcohol duties are a significant source of revenue for the UK government, with an estimated raise of £12.7 billion in 2024-25. This amount represents 1.1% of all receipts and equates to approximately £437 per household, or 0.5% of the national income. The taxation of alcohol has recently shifted to a system based on the product's final alcohol by volume (ABV), which has harmonized tax rates across different beverage types and reduced the number of rates. This new system also introduced a draught relief measure, allowing for reduced duty rates on certain draught products.

Alcohol duties are levied on purchases of beer, cider, wine, and spirits, with varying rates depending on the alcohol content. The duty rates have remained frozen since the Autumn Budget in 2020, but the government has announced plans to increase the duty rates under the revised structure. The public finances assume that alcohol duty rates will increase annually by the Retail Price Index (RPI). This measure aims to manage the country's finances responsibly.

The impact of these measures on individuals and households who consume alcoholic beverages depends on whether the changes in duty rates are passed on through higher or lower prices. Individuals who consume draught alcohol in pubs and hospitality venues may experience a different impact compared to those who purchase alcohol from off-trade venues like supermarkets. Additionally, those who consume stronger alcoholic products may pay more under the revised duty structure.

The changes in alcohol duty rates are expected to have a negligible impact on businesses involved in alcohol production, importation, or warehousing. These businesses may incur minor one-off costs related to familiarization with the new processes, software updates, and staff training. Increasing all alcohol duty rates by RPI may lead to a slight decrease in overall alcohol consumption in the UK. However, the increased draught relief differential could encourage more supervised drinking in licensed premises, supporting the hospitality sector.

Frequently asked questions