Bottles Vs. Cans: Which Beer Packaging Saves More?

There are several factors to consider when it comes to the cost of beer in cans or bottles. While the container may not always be a deciding factor, the cost of beer in cans versus bottles is influenced by market considerations such as brand size, brand pricing, volume, transportation costs, and popularity.

For example, a single bottle of beer from Ecliptic Brewing costs $3.99, while a six-pack of cans costs $10.49, making the cans a more economical option for the consumer. Additionally, canned beer is often more affordable due to the manufacturing and packaging costs associated with bottles, particularly glass ones, which tend to be more expensive to produce and package.

When comparing kegs, bottles, and cans, it's important to consider the total costs involved. While buying in bulk may seem cheaper, there are additional expenses to consider, such as the cost of cups, ice, and rental fees for keg taps and buckets.

Environmental factors also play a role in the cost analysis, with aluminum cans made from recycled materials offering a more sustainable option compared to glass bottles, which have lower recycling rates and a larger carbon footprint.

Cans are more environmentally friendly

While glass bottles are made from silica, an abundant resource, they are heavy, which means they have a larger carbon footprint when it comes to transportation. They also require a lot of thick cardboard packaging to prevent them from breaking. Aluminium cans, on the other hand, are lightweight, reducing emissions from transport at every stage from manufacture to consumption and disposal. They are also stackable, which means they can be transported more efficiently than bottles.

Aluminium cans are recycled more often than bottles. According to the Aluminum Association, cans are made with 70% recycled content, and people recycle their cans 20% more than glass. Recycling a can also uses 90% less energy than recycling a glass bottle.

However, the process of making new aluminium cans is more environmentally harmful than making glass bottles. Aluminium is mined in the form of bauxite ore in destructive strip mines, requiring vast amounts of electrical energy to smelt the ore. The energy used to produce a tonne of virgin aluminium from bauxite can be up to ten times the electricity used to manufacture the same amount of glass from sand.

Another downside of cans is that they are lined with a thin plastic layer to prevent the beer from corroding the aluminium. This plastic is burnt off during the recycling process.

Overall, the environmental impact of cans versus bottles is a complex issue, and there are arguments for both options. However, when it comes to the question of which is more environmentally friendly, cans have several advantages over bottles.

Bottles are better for single servings

When it comes to beer, there are several factors to consider when deciding between cans and bottles. While cans are generally more portable and cost-effective, there are several reasons why bottles are better for single servings. Firstly, bottles provide a true single-serving experience. While cans are typically sold in packs, bottles can be purchased individually, making them more convenient for those who wish to consume just one beer. This also eliminates the need to worry about storing unfinished beer, as bottles can be resealed with a cork or stopper.

Secondly, bottles are often associated with a more premium and authentic product. The traditional image of a glass bottle creates an impression of quality and craftsmanship, which is especially important for craft beer enthusiasts. This perception of higher quality can also lead to a more enjoyable drinking experience. Additionally, bottles offer a more sensory and ritualistic drinking experience. The act of opening a bottle with a bottle opener and hearing the pop of the cork can enhance the overall pleasure of drinking beer for some consumers.

Another advantage of bottles is that they are better for beers that are higher in alcohol by volume (ABV) or contain Belgian yeast. Beer ages better in glass bottles, and they are also better at preserving the flavour and quality of the beer. Glass bottles provide a barrier against light exposure, which can cause a chemical reaction and result in a "skunky" taste in beer. While brown bottles offer the best protection against light, clear bottles provide no light protection, and green bottles offer only slightly better protection than clear ones.

Lastly, bottles are more environmentally friendly than cans. While both glass and aluminium production have negative environmental impacts, glass bottles can be reused multiple times, reducing waste. Additionally, the bottling process is cheaper than canning, making it a more cost-effective option for homebrewers. Overall, while cans may be more convenient for bulk purchases, bottles offer several advantages for single servings, including a more premium experience, better flavour preservation, and environmental benefits.

Beer in cans tastes better for longer

When it comes to the question of whether it is cheaper to buy beer in cans or bottles, the answer may depend on a few factors. Some sources suggest that canned beer is the cheapest option, while others claim that various factors can affect the overall cost, such as the need for additional purchases like cups and ice when buying kegs. However, the focus of this discussion is on the statement "Beer in cans tastes better for longer."

Additionally, cans are lighter and more durable than glass bottles, making them more convenient for transportation and outdoor activities. They are less fragile and easier to pack, reducing the risk of accidental breakage. This makes cans ideal for camping trips, parties, or any situation where glass might be prohibited for safety reasons.

Another factor contributing to the longevity of taste in canned beer is the absence of lightstruck flavours. When beer is exposed to UV light, it can undergo chemical changes that affect its flavour. This is less likely to occur in cans since they block out light completely. As a result, canned beer maintains its original flavour for a more extended period.

Furthermore, cans are lined with food-safe plastic to prevent any metallic taste from leaching into the beer. While some people may still detect a metallic taste, it is often due to smelling the can itself rather than the beer inside.

It is worth noting that the type of beer can also influence its taste and freshness over time. For example, researchers found that an amber ale stayed fresher in bottles, while the container choice made less of a difference for an India Pale Ale (IPA). This suggests that the specific characteristics of the beer, such as its ingredient composition and chemical properties, can interact with the container type to determine how well the beer retains its flavour.

In conclusion, beer in cans often tastes better for longer due to factors such as light protection, durability, and the prevention of metallic tastes. However, the specific type of beer and individual preferences may also play a role in the overall taste experience.

Bottles are more expensive to manufacture and package

When it comes to the cost of beer, there are several factors to consider, including the container in which it is packaged. While bottles and cans serve the same purpose, they differ in terms of manufacturing and packaging costs, which can ultimately impact the price that consumers pay. In this regard, bottles are generally more expensive to manufacture and package than cans, and this additional cost can be passed on to the consumer, making bottled beer relatively more expensive than canned beer.

There are several reasons why bottles are more expensive to manufacture and package. Firstly, the cost of the raw materials used in glass production is relatively high, and the process of transforming these materials into glass bottles requires a lot of heat and energy. The heavy weight of glass bottles also contributes to higher transportation costs, as more fuel is needed to move them from one place to another. Additionally, glass bottles are fragile and can break easily, which can lead to increased costs due to breakage during production, storage, and transportation.

On the other hand, cans, typically made of aluminum, offer cost advantages in several areas. The manufacturing process for aluminum cans is generally more efficient and less costly compared to glass bottle production. This is partly due to the lower cost of the raw materials used in aluminum production, as well as the energy efficiency of the manufacturing process. Aluminum cans are also lighter and more compact than glass bottles, which translates to reduced storage and shipping costs for breweries and distributors. The lightweight nature of aluminum cans also makes them easier to stack and transport, further reducing overall costs.

The economic considerations don't end with manufacturing and packaging. The choice between bottles and cans can also impact other aspects of the beer distribution process and influence the final cost to the consumer. For example, bottles are associated with a more traditional and premium image, which can affect consumer perception and influence their buying decisions. Bottled beer is often perceived as a mark of quality and authenticity, and consumers may be willing to pay a higher price for this perceived premium product. On the other hand, cans are gaining popularity due to their practicality, environmental benefits, and ability to maintain beer freshness. As a result, breweries that offer canned beer can tap into new markets, expand their customer base, and potentially increase their sales and revenue.

While bottles may be more expensive to manufacture and package, it's worth noting that other factors can also influence the cost of beer. For example, specialty aged or casked beers are often sold in brown bottles to protect the flavors from light exposure, and these bottled beers can be significantly more expensive than canned beers. Additionally, the brand, size, pricing, volume, transportation costs, and popularity of a particular beer can also impact the price, regardless of whether it is packaged in a bottle or a can. Ultimately, the decision between bottles and cans depends on various factors, including personal preference, the specific context of consumption, and the priorities of both the brewery and the consumer.

Cans are more convenient for outdoor activities

When it comes to outdoor activities, cans are superior to bottles for several reasons. Firstly, cans are lightweight, making them ideal for outdoor activities such as hiking or walking. Carrying heavy glass bottles can be cumbersome and tiring, especially over long distances. The lightweight nature of cans also makes them easier to transport, whether you're bringing them home from the store or packing them for a picnic.

Another advantage of cans is their durability. They are made of metal, which makes them robust and resistant to pressure. This is particularly beneficial for outdoor activities where there is a risk of dropping or knocking over your drink. Glass bottles, on the other hand, are fragile and prone to breaking, which can create a mess and even cause injuries.

Cans are also more convenient when it comes to drinking and disposal. They are easy to open and can be disposed of in any trash bin. In contrast, bottles may require a bottle opener, and the larger size of bottles means you'll need to find a suitable place to dispose of them after finishing your drink.

Additionally, cans are better suited for cooling, which is often necessary for outdoor activities during hot weather. They cool down faster than bottles, ensuring that you have cold beverages ready for your outing. This is especially important if you're short on time before heading out.

Lastly, cans are more environmentally friendly than bottles. They have a smaller carbon footprint due to their lightweight nature and require less cardboard for packaging and transportation. This is particularly relevant for outdoor activities where minimizing waste and environmental impact is crucial.

Frequently asked questions